CMS & ONC have promulgated their Final Rules to implement the 21st Century Cures Act. A main goal is to accelerate the access, exchange and use of electronic health information (EHI). One way this is being accomplished is to require certain entities and actors to provide Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) that use a new standard for data access and exchange called Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (aka “FHIR”). These new standards for adopting FHIR for information exchange is expected to exponentially accelerate individuals ability to access and share EHI through mobile apps, as well as allow any third-party adopting such FHIR standards to obtain access to such EHI. Especially for HIPAA Privacy Officers, Security Officers, Compliance Officers and attorneys who have for years focused on ensuring that their organizations do not make the mistake of releasing protected health information to a third-party in violation of federal or state privacy and security laws, I feel your pain on FHIR!
You Should Know Your Affirmative Defenses if OCR Investigates You for HIPAA Violations
The HIPAA Enforcement Rule prevents the Secretary/OCR from assessing civil monetary penalties (CMP) against a covered entity or business associate if an Affirmative Defense can be established. A HIPAA violation that is corrected within 30 days of discovery can potentially insulate an organization from CMPs, provided certain requirements are met. But an organization has to make sure that it fits squarely within the requirements of these regulatory defenses to be fully insulated.
Don’t Miss CMS’s Engagement Calls for Ongoing COVID-19 Developments
Need access to current information about COVID-19 and Medicare? CMS is holding stakeholder engagement calls to provide an opportunity for hospitals, health systems, and providers. The Webcast sessions are intended to provide updates, share best practices among peers, and offer attendees an opportunity to ask questions of CMS and other subject matter experts.
Why Privacy & Consent Will Remain a Central Hurdle to Health Info Exchange Despite the Info Blocking Rule
Under the Privacy Exception, an Actor is permitted to not fulfill a request received to access, exchange, or use EHI to protect an individual’s privacy. The sub-exception for a “precondition-not-satisfied” will continue to put state laws governing privacy and consent at the center of decisions about whether EHI will be shared with third parties. Healthcare providers and HIEs/HINs especially will need to ensure that they have identified and analyzed each legal precondition to the release of EHI that is applicable to the particular type of entity and type of information that is implicated.
Is Your Organization Ready to Send Patient Information to Apps by November?
Becker’s Hospital Review reported that 70% of CIOs are “concerned” about meeting the upcoming November 2nd deadline for complying with the Final Rules prohibiting information blocking practices. This is according to a survey conducted by CHIME, which included responses from executives at academic medical centers, critical access hospitals, multi-hospital systems and specialty hospitals. Although the survey did not appear to identify specifically what concerns CIOs about complying with information blocking rules by this fall, one possibility is fully understanding how ONC’s information blocking rules will apply to releasing patients’ EHI to third-party apps.
WEBINAR: Learn Which HIPAA Policies to Revise for ONC’s New Information Blocking Rule, Plus More!
Join the NJ Chapter of HIMSS and Helen Oscislawski for this Webinar to get a lean and focused overview of what you need to do to comply with ONC’s and CMS’s final rules implementing the 21st Century Cures Act. On April 24, 2020, the OIG also released its Proposed Rule on CMPs to be imposed against Actors who engage in prohibited “Information Blocking.” These new rules turn on their heads certain HIPAA policies and procedures.
New HHS Guidance on Laboratory COVID-19 Data Reporting Recognizes Valuable Role of HIEs
Late last week, HHS published new Guidance that specifies what additional data must be reported by laboratories along with COVID-19 test results. Reporting of certain data elements by laboratories are legally required, while reporting of other identifiable demographic data is encouraged but not mandatory. The Guidance notes that state and local privacy standards apply to the collection of identifiable demographic data. Importantly, HHS expressly supports health information exchanges (HIEs) being leveraged to facilitate required data collection and reporting.
5 Reasons Why Your Training is Not Preventing HIPAA Violations by Employees
A State Court of Appeals recently reinstated a patient’s claim that an Indiana hospital is vicariously liable for the actions of its employee who shared the patient’s confidential information with an unauthorized third party. Although the lower court originally dismissed the case, the appellate court found that there is a “genuine issue of fact” and remanded the case for further proceedings. Now a potential monetary settlement teeters on the edge as the hospital’s potential liability for this employee’s HIPAA non-compliance rests in the hands of further proceedings in the lower court – so, you might want to ask why did this happen in the first place?
* HIPAA Training that is too basic and not focused on specific risk areas and organizational policies is not only non-compliant, but also largely ineffective.
* HIPAA covered entities should have clear policies and training that address specific employee behaviors that are “high risk” for HIPAA violations.
* Organizations must make sure they are training EVERYONE, and implementing effective Security Reminders.
“To Block, or Not to Block,” that is the question…
Deciding whether “to block, or not to block” health information based on an exception laid out in ONC’s Final Rule can quickly turn into a Shakespearean tragedy unless Actors understand in advance the specific criteria that must be met in order to satisfy any such applicable exception.
Will ONC’s Final Rule put HIEs between a “Block and a Hard Place”?
Under the ONC’s Final Rule on Information Blocking, Health Care Providers, HIEs and HINs will be legally prohibited from interfering with the access, exchange, or use of EHI unless an exception applies. However, HIEs/HINs that are HIPAA Business Associates are not allowed to use or further disclose PHI other than as permitted or required by their HIPAA BAAs with respective health care providers. So, what happens if a Health Care Provider and its HIPAA Business Associate HIE/HIN disagree on whether an exception allows EHI to be withheld from access, exchange or use under a certain set of specific facts?
Don’t Make the Mistake of Over-Reporting Data Breaches Under HIPAA
Evaluating incidents that affect protected health information (PHI) to determine whether they must be reported under HIPAA’s Breach Notification Rule is a delicate balancing act. On the one hand, a HIPAA covered entity will want to avoid reporting an incident to the Secretary of HHS if it is not required to do so under the standards set forth in HIPAA’s Breach Notification Rule. On the other hand, a HIPAA covered entity that fails to report a HIPAA Breach risks being exposed to penalties from OCR for each day such Breach was not reported when it should have been. A recent Becker’s Health IT article brought attention to a Notice posted by Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago
Are Lawsuits for Violations of HIPAA’s Deidentification Standards About to Take Off – and What Can You Do About It?
A recent opinion article published in STAT News explored whether potential litigation is looming surrounding the de-identified data exception in HIPAA. The authors of the article point out that “large volumes of data underpin the development of any AI effort,” which is why companies…
Legal HIE has Relaunched with a NEW Membership Subscription Option!
Welcome (or, to some, “welcome back”) to Legal HIE -- we are thrilled that you are here! What started off informally as a wildly popular blog almost 10 years ago is now back (and still free) — but BETTER! Legal HIE readers now have an new option to subscribe to an annual Membership and gain...
OIG issues Proposed Rule for Civil Monetary Penalties for Information Blocking
On Friday, April 24th, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of HHS published a Proposed Rule to amend the civil monetary penalties (CMP) rules to incorporate new authorities for investigating and assessing monetary penalties for Information Blocking violations.
ONC Delays Enforcement of the Information Blocking Certification Provisions of its CURES Act Final Rule for 3 months
Today, ONC announced that it will exercise its discretion in enforcing all new requirements under its Cures Act Final Rule which have compliance dates and time frames until 3 months after each such date identified in the Final Rule. The ONC Final Rule is scheduled to be published on May 1, 2020 in the Federal Register. The ONC has developed an “Enforcement Discretion Dates and Time frames” chart which indicates that the Part 170 Information Blocking provisions will have a compliance Enforcement Discretion Date of February 1, 2021.